But I really hate to connect my external monitor every time I need to check something (settings or simply focus and exposure).Īs long as you carry it on drone with S.Bus and HDMI transmitter is the perfect tool, but you can't replace a GoPro for action shots. I own a Micro Cinema Camera and I love the picture it comes out from it. Otherwise, no real advantage to flying the Micro Studio, only disadvantages and additional cost. My preference would be to fly the Micro Cinema camera, unless I really needed UHD files. The Micro Cinema camera adds Film Log and Raw HD recording to the camera's own internal SD card recorder, has analog PWM remote in addition to a S3 Buss, an analog RCA video output to feed to the drone's transmitter for monitoring in the ground, and costs less than the Micro Studio camera alone. So there is not real advantage to flying a Micro Studio camera, unless you have a large enough drone to carry an extra 4K/UHD recorder. If UHD files are a must, you could look into a wireless UHD video transmitter that could feed the signal back to a Video Assist 4K on the ground, this would give you a camera monitor on the ground (only way to get this as the Studio also lacks a analog video out. For a drone, the best external recorder would be something like the little Atomos Ninja Star, which adds 4.6'oz, and still only records HD via a HDMI connection, needs is own battery, more weight, and a CFast card to record on, another $450 to add to the pot. Futher, it is not a full 4K camera, but rather a UHD camera, designed to be used with a switcher or external recorder.
I have both Micro cameras, and while the Studio has a higher resolution, it is a arc 709 Video signal only Studio camera", no analog PWM control, only S3 bus digital remote control, and it lacks any kind of video recorder.
0 kommentar(er)
